Investors face property dilemma created by Covid-19
Lockdowns have dented values and rental prospects of properties, making investment a big gamble.
The coronavirus pandemic has emptied offices and shuttered shops but filled warehouses and highlighted demand for work-from-home spaces, leaving investors wondering if they should flee real estate or double down on their bets.
Property has long been a staple of a balanced investment portfolio, favoured by pension funds and insurers seeking assets that combine capital value growth offered by stocks with secure income akin to bonds.
But government lockdowns to contain Covid-19 have spurred unprecedented changes in the way billions of people live and work, denting values and rental prospects of malls and skyscrapers, making property investment a far bigger gamble.
Millions of staff are now working from home while online shopping sales reported by Alibaba and Amazon have soared.
Savills, a real estate services provider, is forecasting prime European office rents to drop by between 2 and 10 per cent this year, while first-quarter yields on prime European shopping centres have softened by 39 basis points to 5.1 per cent compared to 2019.
In contrast, demand for logistics real estate could grow by 14 to 19 million square metres (sq m) annually for the next two to three years in the United States, industrial property firm ProLogis said.
Some of the boldest investors are not only sticking with the property asset class but raising their stakes.
Data from alternative assets research firm Preqin showed European focused property funds attracted US$13.2 billion from investors between April 1 and May 28, the highest quarterly volume seen since the fourth quarter of 2017, with one month of the quarter remaining.
Swopping offices and shops for storage and industrial property appears like a simple solution.
But few analysts and advisers are certain that changes to the way the world uses real estate will outlast the pandemic, and radical portfolio shifts now could cost investors dearly.
Asset allocators like Columbia Threadneedle have confirmed “neutral” stances on property this week, while many of the world’s biggest companies have given mixed signals on their future real estate needs, compounding uncertainty for landlords.
Mastercard, Visa and American Express have ruled out rapid returns to the office and may consolidate buildings if staff prefer home-based working.
Others like Exane, part of BNP Paribas, are expanding their offices. Exane two weeks back agreed to lease 3,716 sq m in London from Great Portland Estates for its cash equities business.
A global economic downturn could hurt rental rates and trigger vacancies in some cases but broader market fundamentals remain supportive of careful property investment, analysts said.
With government bond yields trending downwards and even sliding into negative territory, some 15 per cent of corporate bonds seeing downgrades and the mass cancellation of stock dividends, investors are thirsting for income that property could satisfy.
Expectations that US$9 trillion of global coronavirus stimulus efforts by policymakers could fuel inflation in 2021 may further boost demand for property, which can hedge against inflation’s hit to bonds and gilts.
As fears about the longevity of a US stock market rally gather pace, some investors are expected to lock in gains, which could see more cash move into alternative assets.
Given such uncertainty on future cash flows linked to offices and malls, some advisers and investors said residential investment might be the safest bet for now.
UBS said US apartments had the highest average rent collections of any major property type and a 4.2 per cent first-quarter vacancy rate was in line with previous quarters.
Two weeks ago, British insurer Aviva said it expected the coronavirus to knock residential values by 12 per cent but commercial assets would fall by 15 per cent before growth resumed. REUTERS